We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce GTX 1660 Super, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks. GTX 1660 Ti 2019 6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt 33.47 +1.3% GTX 1660 Super 2019 6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt 33.05 GTX 1650 GTX 1060 6 GB RTX 3060 RTX 4060 RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER RTX 4090 RX 580 Arc A580 RX 5700 RX 7600 XT RX 7800 XT RX 7900 XTX GTX 1660 Ti outperforms GTX 1660 Super by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results. GTX 1660 Ti GTX 1660 Super GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared. Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better. GTX 1660 Super has 32% better value for money than GTX 1660 Ti. General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed.Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GTX 1660 Ti33.47 +1.3% GTX 1660 Super33.05 This isthe most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. GTX 1660 Ti12912 +1.3% GTX 1660 Super12750 3DMark 11is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11is now superseded by Time Spy. GTX 1660 Ti22892 +4.1% GTX 1660 Super21981 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displayinga space fleet attack ona defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. GTX 1660 Ti61217 GTX 1660 Super76654 +25.2% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. GTX 1660 Ti16024 +0.2% GTX 1660 Super15995 Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displaysa few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just likeIce Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. GTX 1660 Ti93095 GTX 1660 Super95473 +2.6% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesOpenCLAPI by Khronos Group. GTX 1660 Ti61065 GTX 1660 Super62665 +2.6% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. GTX 1660 Ti483604 +1.4% GTX 1660 Super477037 Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesVulkanAPI by AMD & Khronos Group. GTX 1660 Ti58262 GTX 1660 Super60388 +3.6% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesCUDAAPI by NVIDIA. GTX 1660 Ti65308 +0.4% GTX 1660 Super65044 GTX 1660 Ti90 GTX 1660 Super134 +49.4% GTX 1660 Ti52 GTX 1660 Super57 +9.1% GTX 1660 Ti8 GTX 1660 Super9 +8.9% GTX 1660 Ti51 GTX 1660 Super63 +23% GTX 1660 Ti40 GTX 1660 Super41 +2% GTX 1660 Ti27 GTX 1660 Super31 +16.9% GTX 1660 Ti7 GTX 1660 Super8 +12.3% This part ofSPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes. GTX 1660 Ti123 GTX 1660 Super128 +3.7% GTX 1660 Ti163 +6.2% GTX 1660 Super154 This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulateswork with 3DSMax, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, includingarchitectural modeling and animation for computer games. GTX 1660 Ti159 +3.6% GTX 1660 Super154 Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: +12% −12% +7.3% −7.3% +27.6% −27.6% Full HD +2.6% −2.6% Full HD −2.3% +2.3% +12.1% −12.1% +21.5% −21.5% +18.8% −18.8% +12.7% −12.7% +40.5% −40.5% −8% +8% +32% −32% −10% +10% −121% +121% −7.5% +7.5% +48.8% −48.8% +46.2% −46.2% −80.8% +80.8% Full HD −10.7% +10.7% +14.6% −14.6% +13.1% −13.1% +18.1% −18.1% +9.6% −9.6% +10.8% −10.8% −8.9% +8.9% +24.6% −24.6% −7.1% +7.1% −100% +100% −3.5% +3.5% +0% +0% −1.6% +1.6% +1.4% −1.4% −73.3% +73.3% Full HD +3.9% −3.9% +13.6% −13.6% +27.3% −27.3% −6.5% +6.5% −21.3% +21.3% −10.3% +10.3% +7.7% −7.7% +3% −3% −1.8% +1.8% +1.6% −1.6% +287% −287% Full HD +70.2% −70.2% 1440p +19% −19% −5.6% +5.6% 1440p +2.5% −2.5% +5.9% −5.9% +36.8% −36.8% +3.8% −3.8% +7.9% −7.9% +6.3% −6.3% −2.4% +2.4% +5.6% −5.6% −3.1% +3.1% −2.6% +2.6% +2.2% −2.2% −12.6% +12.6% 1440p +16.1% −16.1% 4K +9.1% −9.1% −6.9% +6.9% +8% −8% +147% −147% +4.5% −4.5% +7.5% −7.5% 4K +4.2% −4.2% +5.6% −5.6% +31.6% −31.6% +0% +0% +5.3% −5.3% −5.9% +5.9% −2.3% +2.3% +33.3% −33.3% 4K +57.1% −57.1% This is how GTX 1660 Ti and GTX 1660 Super compete in popular games: Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games: All in all, in popular games: GTX 1660 Ti has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 4.2% lower power consumption. GTX 1660 Super, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months. Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce GTX 1660 Super. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Super Like Like We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. 4.27674 votes Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: 4.319864 votes Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.Aggregate performance score
Contents
Primary details
Place in the ranking 158 161 Place by popularity 33 8 Cost-effectiveness evaluation 44.64 58.98 Power efficiency 19.44 18.43 Architecture Turing (2018−2022) Turing (2018−2022) GPU code name TU116 TU116 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release date 22 February 2019 (5 years ago) 29 October 2019 (5 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $279 $229 Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Detailed specifications
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1536 1408 Core clock speed 1500 MHz 1530 MHz Boost clock speed 1770 MHz 1785 MHz Number of transistors 6,600 million 6,600 million Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 125 Watt Texture fill rate 169.9 157.1 Floating-point processing power 5.437 TFLOPS 5.027 TFLOPS ROPs 48 48 TMUs 96 88 Form factor & compatibility
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 229 mm 229 mm Width 2-slot 2-slot Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 1x 8-pin VRAM capacity and type
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6 Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 6 GB Memory bus width 192 Bit 192 Bit Memory clock speed 1500 MHz 1750 MHz Memory bandwidth 288.0 GB/s 336.0 GB/s Shared memory - - Connectivity and outputs
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort HDMI + + HDCP - + G-SYNC support - + Supported technologies
NVENC no data + Ansel no data + API compatibility
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_1) Shader Model 6.5 6.5 OpenGL 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 1.2 1.2 Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2.131 CUDA 7.5 7.5 Synthetic benchmark performance
Combined synthetic benchmark score
Passmark
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
GeekBench 5 CUDA
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max
Gaming performance
Average FPS across all PC games
Full HD 103 92 1440p 59 55 4K 37 29 Cost per frame, $
1080p 2.71 2.49 1440p 4.73 4.16 4K 7.54 7.90 FPS performance in popular games
Low PresetCyberpunk 2077 78 76
Medium PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 86 88 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74 66 Battlefield 5 130 100−110 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95 80 Cyberpunk 2077 71 63 Far Cry 5 104 70−75 Far Cry New Dawn 112 121 Forza Horizon 4 231 170−180 Hitman 3 70−75 77 Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 321 Metro Exodus 134 144 Red Dead Redemption 2 119 80 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 171 110−120 Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130 217
High PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 122 135 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55 48 Battlefield 5 121 100−110 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85 72 Cyberpunk 2077 57 52 Far Cry 5 82 70−75 Far Cry New Dawn 79 86 Forza Horizon 4 218 170−180 Hitman 3 70−75 75 Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150 290 Metro Exodus 114 118 Red Dead Redemption 2 89 89 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 127 129 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75 65−70 Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130 208
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 53 51 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50 44 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70 55 Cyberpunk 2077 46 49 Far Cry 5 61 70−75 Forza Horizon 4 97 107 Hitman 3 70−75 65 Horizon Zero Dawn 102 99 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110 112 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62 61 Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130 31
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 97 57
High PresetBattlefield 5 75 60−65 Far Cry New Dawn 54 57
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 41 40 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 36 34 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52 38 Cyberpunk 2077 27 26 Far Cry 5 41 35−40 Forza Horizon 4 202 190−200 Hitman 3 40−45 43 Horizon Zero Dawn 75 71 Metro Exodus 65 67 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78 80 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 45−50 Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180 196
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 65 56
High PresetBattlefield 5 36 30−35 Far Cry New Dawn 29 31 Hitman 3 27−30 25 Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170 66 Metro Exodus 46 44 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43 40
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 25 24 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19 18 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25 19 Cyberpunk 2077 11 11 Far Cry 5 20 18−20 Forza Horizon 4 51 54 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43 44 Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 12
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 44 28 Pros & cons summary
Performance score 33.47 33.05 Recency 22 February 2019 29 October 2019 Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 125 Watt Vote for your favorite
![GTX 1660 Super vs GTX 1660 Ti [19-Benchmark Showdown] (5)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/en/video_images/177/image?thumbnail=yes&maxwidth=38&maxheight=38&webp=1 "GTX 1660 Super vs GTX 1660 Ti [19-Benchmark Showdown] (5)")
![GTX 1660 Super vs GTX 1660 Ti [19-Benchmark Showdown] (6)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/en/video_logotypes/3/image?thumbnail=yes&maxwidth=38&maxheight=38 "GTX 1660 Super vs GTX 1660 Ti [19-Benchmark Showdown] (6)")
Comparisons with similar GPUs
Community ratings
![GTX 1660 Super vs GTX 1660 Ti [19-Benchmark Showdown] (33)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/images/smile_sad.png "GTX 1660 Super vs GTX 1660 Ti [19-Benchmark Showdown] (33)")
![GTX 1660 Super vs GTX 1660 Ti [19-Benchmark Showdown] (34)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/images/smile.png "GTX 1660 Super vs GTX 1660 Ti [19-Benchmark Showdown] (34)")
Questions & comments
GeForce GTX1660 Ti vsGeForce GTXTITAN X
GeForce GTX1660 Super vsGeForce RTX3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX1660 Ti vsTitan XPascal
GeForce GTX1660 Ti vsRadeon RX5500M
GeForce GTX1660 Ti vsRadeon RX5300M
GeForce GTX1660 Ti vsAdreno685
GeForce GTX1660 Ti vsRadeon Pro5500M
GeForce GTX1660 Ti vsRadeon Pro5300M
GeForce GTX1660 Ti vsRadeon RX5500
GeForce GTX1660 Ti vsRadeon RX5500 XT
GeForce GTX1660 Ti vsUHDGraphics
GeForce GTX1660 Ti vsGeForce GTX1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX1660 Ti vsQuadro RTX8000 Passive
![GTX 1660 Super vs GTX 1660 Ti [19-Benchmark Showdown] (2024)]()